Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Press release from Austria on mice trials with Mon 810 maize - low fertility claims but stats up and down

Genetically modified maize lowers fertility in mice, study finds
11.nov.08
from a press release Via Agnet
DPA

Vienna -- Feeding mice with genetically engineered maize developed by the US-based Monsanto corporation led to lower fertility and body weight, according to a study conducted by the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna presented Tuesday. In the study, mice fed with the NK603 x MON810 sweetcorn variety over a period of 20 weeks showed a smaller litter size and lighter offspring than mice fed with non-engineered maize.
The differences "were statistically significant in the third and fourth litters," according to an abstract of the study led by Professor Juergen Zentek and commissioned by Austria's Environment Ministry.


Although in an alternative set-up of the study the differences between the groups of mice were found to be less pronounced and statistically not significant, the environmental organization Global 2000 said this meant that further long-term tests were needed.


Austria has long resisted calls by the European Commission to allow the use of genetically modified food, but it finally had to lift its ban on MON810 maize as animal feed last year.


However, Austrian feed companies have so far agreed to a self- imposed ban on MON810.


The tested corn breed is a cross of MON810 and another variety and is designed to be resistant against herbicides and insects.


An expert panel of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) found in 2005 that the hybrid was "safe for human and animal health."
Following the release of the study at a conference in Vienna, Global 2000 and Greenpeace criticized EFSA's approval of the variety and called for a ban of genetically engineered maize.


"It is now vital to keep animal feed in Austria free of genetically engineered maize, and an immediate ban on the use of genetically engineered maize MON810 in Austria is the order of the day," Global 2000 spokesman Jens Karp said.

GMO Pundit:

We'll have to wait till this is published to see what the statistics tell us.

Update:

15th November 2008

Access to the full report is via this subsequent GMO Pundit Post on the Austrian feeding experiments with Mon 810.

A full exposition of the analysis of variance in these experiments does not appear to be provided in the Austrian report. Absence of this ANOVA makes interpretation of differences problematical. An explanation of why this is important is available in a subsequent GMO Pundit post on GMO statistics.

20th November 2008

The Monsanto Company makes a scientific reponse pointing out some flaws in the Austrian mouse feeding study on Mon 830 x NK 603

Labels: , ,

1 Comments:

At 8:07 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hello,
Congratulations for this blog, very good quality articles.
Actually I was wondering if you have some data about the fact Austria has to lift his ban on MON810. As far as I know the european council supported the Austrian gouvernment
http://www.euractiv.com/en/environment/austria-finds-backing-gmo-bans/article-160555 but maybe I'm wrong.
And the worse is that France will try to do the same and take the opportunity to currently lead europe to modify the approval process. France wants the scientists agree with the "feelings" of people.
As I read on a other blog, someone said to summarize the situation: "people see that the sun turns around the Earth so the scientits have to agree".
I'm looking forward to read this article, I would not be surprise to deal again with a "Séralini's like" statistical approach.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home